qa-expert

charon-fan/agent-playbook · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/charon-fan/agent-playbook --skill qa-expert
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Quality assurance specialist for developing comprehensive testing strategies and quality gates.

skill.md

QA Expert

Quality assurance specialist for developing comprehensive testing strategies and quality gates.

When This Skill Activates

Activates when you:

  • Ask for QA strategy
  • Need quality gates
  • Want to improve test coverage
  • Plan testing approach

Quality Assurance Strategy

1. Risk-Based Testing

Prioritize testing based on risk:

Risk Level Testing Approach
Critical (Money, Security, Data) 100% automation, chaos testing
High (Core features) Full E2E, integration, unit
Medium (Secondary features) Integration, unit
Low (Edge features) Unit tests only

2. Testing Pyramid Allocation

Level % of Tests Focus
E2E 10% Critical user journeys
Integration 30% API interactions
Unit 60% Business logic, utilities

3. Quality Gates

Pre-Commit

- Lint: npm run lint
- Format check: npm run format:check
- Type check: npm run type-check
- Unit tests: npm run test:unit

Pre-Merge

- All tests: npm test
- Coverage threshold: > 80%
- Security scan: npm audit
- License check: npm run check:licenses

Pre-Production

- Full test suite: npm run test:all
- E2E tests: npm run test:e2e
- Performance tests: npm run test:perf
- Security audit: npm audit --audit-level high

Test Categories

Functional Testing

Purpose: Verify features work as specified

  • Happy path testing
  • Edge case testing
  • Boundary value analysis
  • Error handling

Non-Functional Testing

Performance

  • Response time < 200ms (p95)
  • Throughput > 1000 req/s
  • Memory usage stable
  • No memory leaks

Security

  • OWASP Top 10 coverage
  • Penetration testing
  • Dependency vulnerability scan
  • Secrets detection

Compatibility

  • Browser testing (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge)
  • Device testing (Mobile, Desktop, Tablet)
  • OS testing (Windows, macOS, Linux)
  • Version testing (N-1 browser versions)

Regression Testing

  • Previous bugs don't reappear
  • New features don't break existing features
  • Performance doesn't degrade

Exploratory Testing

  • Find unexpected issues
  • Test edge cases
  • User experience issues

Test Planning

Test Plan Template

# Test Plan: [Feature Name]

## Overview
[Feature description]

## Scope
[In scope / Out of scope]

## Test Cases

### Functional
- [ ] TC001: [Description]
- [ ] TC002: [Description]

### Integration
- [ ] TC101: [Description]

### E2E
- [ ] TC201: [Description]

## Test Data
[Required test data]

## Environment
[Test environment setup]

## Schedule
[Testing timeline]

## Exit Criteria
[Definition of done]

Quality Metrics

Code Quality

  • Test Coverage: > 80%
  • Cyclomatic Complexity: < 10 per function
  • Code Duplication: < 5%
  • Technical Debt Ratio: < 5%

Defect Metrics

  • Defect Density: < 1 defect per 1000 LOC
  • Critical Defects: 0
  • High Defects: 0
  • Medium Defects: < 3

Test Metrics

  • Test Pass Rate: > 95%
  • Flaky Tests: 0
  • Test Execution Time: < 10 minutes

Automation Strategy

Automate When

  • Test is run frequently
  • Test has deterministic results
  • Test is stable
  • ROI justifies automation cost

Don't Automate When

  • Test requires human judgment
  • Test is exploratory
  • Test is one-time only
  • Test changes frequently

Bug Report Template

## Bug Summary
[One-line summary]

## Severity
Critical / High / Medium / Low

## Steps to Reproduce
1.
2.
3.

## Expected Behavior
[What should happen]

## Actual Behavior
[What actually happens]

## Environment
- OS:
- Browser:
- Version:

## Attachments
[Screenshots, logs, etc.]

Scripts

Generate test plan:

python scripts/generate_test_plan.py <feature>

Analyze test coverage:

python scripts/coverage_analysis.py

References

  • references/strategy.md - Testing strategies
  • references/gates.md - Quality gate definitions
  • references/metrics.md - QA metrics and KPIs

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.756 reviews
  • Isabella Zhang· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qa-expert is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Emma Garcia· Dec 20, 2024

    Keeps context tight: qa-expert is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Hassan Liu· Dec 16, 2024

    We added qa-expert from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Tariq Lopez· Dec 12, 2024

    qa-expert has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 4, 2024

    qa-expert fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Nia Desai· Dec 4, 2024

    qa-expert fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 23, 2024

    qa-expert is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Amina Park· Nov 23, 2024

    qa-expert is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Ren Desai· Nov 19, 2024

    Keeps context tight: qa-expert is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Anaya Johnson· Nov 11, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qa-expert is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 56

1 / 6