Typically runs automatically via SessionStart hook.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionextractExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches extract from boshu2/agentops and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate extract. Access via /extract in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
260
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
260
stars
Typically runs automatically via SessionStart hook.
Process pending learning extractions from previous sessions.
The SessionStart hook runs:
ao extract
This checks for queued extractions and outputs prompts for Claude to process.
Given /extract:
ao extract 2>/dev/null
Or check the pending queue:
cat .agents/ao/pending.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -5
If ao CLI is not available, process the pending queue manually:
if ! command -v ao &>/dev/null; then
echo "ao CLI not available — running manual extraction"
# Check for pending queue
if [ -f .agents/ao/pending.jsonl ] && [ -s .agents/ao/pending.jsonl ]; then
echo "Found pending extractions:"
cat .agents/ao/pending.jsonl
# For each pending entry, check for corresponding forge output
# Forge outputs live in .agents/forge/
for forge_file in .agents/forge/*.md; do
[ -f "$forge_file" ] || continue
echo "Processing: $forge_file"
done
else
echo "No pending extractions found."
fi
# After processing, check .agents/forge/ for unprocessed candidates
FORGE_COUNT=$(ls .agents/forge/*.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
if [ "$FORGE_COUNT" -gt 0 ]; then
echo "$FORGE_COUNT forge candidates found — review and extract learnings manually."
echo "For each candidate in .agents/forge/:"
echo " 1. Read the candidate file"
echo " 2. Extract actionable learnings using the template in Step 3"
echo " 3. Write to .agents/learnings/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md"
echo " 4. High-confidence items (>= 0.7) can be promoted directly"
fi
fi
For each forge candidate, extract learnings using the same template format defined in Step 3 of this skill. Write results to .agents/learnings/. After processing, clear the pending queue:
# Clear processed entries
> .agents/ao/pending.jsonl
echo "Pending queue cleared"
For each queued session:
.agents/learnings/Write to: .agents/learnings/YYYY-MM-DD-<session-id>.md
# Learning: <Short Title>
**ID**: L1
**Category**: <debugging|architecture|process|testing|security>
**Confidence**: <high|medium|low>
## What We Learned
<1-2 sentences describing the insight>
## Why It Matters
<1 sentence on impact/value>
## Source
Session: <session-id>
After writing learning files, validate each has required fields:
ls -t .agents/learnings/YYYY-MM-DD-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -5
For each file, check required fields:
# Learning: <title> (non-empty title)**Category**: <value> where value is one of: debugging, architecture, process, testing, security**Confidence**: <value> where value is one of: high, medium, low## What We Learned section with at least one non-empty line after the headingReport validation results:
Do NOT delete or retry invalid learnings. Log the warning and proceed. Invalid learnings are still better than no learnings — the warning helps identify extraction quality issues over time.
ao extract --clear 2>/dev/null
Tell the user:
Session N ends:
→ ao forge --last-session --queue
→ Session queued in pending.jsonl
Session N+1 starts:
→ ao extract (this skill)
→ Claude processes the queue
→ Writes to .agents/learnings/
→ Validates required fields
→ Loop closed
Hook triggers: session-start.sh runs at session start
What happens:
ao extract 2>/dev/null.agents/learnings/<date>-<session>.mdao extract --clear to empty queueResult: Prior session knowledge automatically extracted at session start without user action.
User says: /extract or "extract learnings from last session"
What happens:
ao extract.agents/learnings/ with proper structureResult: Pending extractions processed manually, queue cleared, learnings indexed.
| Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| No pending extractions found | Queue empty or ao CLI unavailable | Check .agents/ao/pending.jsonl exists; verify ao CLI installed |
| Invalid learning warning | Missing category/confidence/content | Review learning file, add missing fields; DO NOT delete |
| extraction --clear fails | CLI not available or permission error | Manually truncate .agents/ao/pending.jsonl as fallback |
| Duplicate extractions | Queue not cleared after processing | Always run ao extract --clear after writing learnings |
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
We added extract from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
I recommend extract for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Registry listing for extract matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Useful defaults in extract — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: extract is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
extract fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
extract has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Keeps context tight: extract is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
extract is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added extract from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 43