Doc Skill

YOU MUST EXECUTE THIS WORKFLOW. Do not just describe it.

Generate and validate documentation for any project.

Execution Steps

Given /doc [command] [target]:

Step 1: Detect Project Type

# Check for indicators
ls package.json pyproject.toml go.mod Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null

# Check for existing docs
ls -d docs/ doc/ documentation/ 2>/dev/null

Classify as:

• CODING: Has source code, needs API docs
• INFORMATIONAL: Primarily documentation (wiki, knowledge base)
• OPS: Infrastructure, deployment, runbooks

Step 2: Execute Command

discover - Find undocumented features:

# Find public functions without docstrings (Python)
grep -r "^def " --include="*.py" | grep -v '"""' | head -20

# Find exported functions without comments (Go)
grep -r "^func [A-Z]" --include="*.go" | head -20

coverage - Check documentation coverage:

# Count documented vs undocumented
TOTAL=$(grep -r "^def \|^func \|^class " --include="*.py" --include="*.go" | wc -l)
DOCUMENTED=$(grep -r '"""' --include="*.py" | wc -l)
echo "Coverage: $DOCUMENTED / $TOTAL"

gen [feature] - Generate documentation:

1. Read the code for the feature
2. Understand what it does
3. Generate appropriate documentation
4. Write to docs/ directory

all - Update all documentation:

1. Run discover to find gaps
2. Generate docs for each undocumented feature
3. Validate existing docs are current

Step 3: Generate Documentation

When generating docs, include:

For Functions/Methods:

## function_name

**Purpose:** What it does

**Parameters:**
- `param1` (type): Description
- `param2` (type): Description

**Returns:** What it returns

**Example:**
```python
result = function_name(arg1, arg2)

Notes: Any important caveats

**For Classes:**
```markdown
## ClassName

**Purpose:** What this class represents

**Attributes:**
- `attr1`: Description
- `attr2`: Description

**Methods:**
- `method1()`: What it does
- `method2()`: What it does

**Usage:**
```python
obj = ClassName()
obj.method1()

### Step 4: Create Code-Map (if requested)

**Write to:** `docs/code-map/`

```markdown
# Code Map: <Project>

## Overview
<High-level architecture>

## Directory Structure

src/ ├── module1/ # Purpose ├── module2/ # Purpose └── utils/ # Shared utilities

## Key Components

### Module 1
- **Purpose:** What it does
- **Entry point:** `main.py`
- **Key files:** `handler.py`, `models.py`

### Module 2
...

## Data Flow
<How data moves through the system>

## Dependencies
<External dependencies and why>

Step 5: Validate Documentation

Check for:

• Out-of-date docs (code changed, docs didn't)
• Missing sections (no examples, no parameters)
• Broken links
• Inconsistent formatting

Step 6: Write Report

Write to: .agents/doc/YYYY-MM-DD-<target>.md

# Documentation Report: <Target>

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Project Type:** <CODING/INFORMATIONAL/OPS>

## Coverage
- Total documentable items: <count>
- Documented: <count>
- Coverage: <percentage>%

## Generated
- <list of docs generated>

## Gaps Found
- <undocumented item 1>
- <undocumented item 2>

## Validation Issues
- <issue 1>
- <issue 2>

## Next Steps
- [ ] Document remaining gaps
- [ ] Fix validation issues

Step 7: Report to User

Tell the user:

1. Documentation coverage percentage
2. Docs generated/updated
3. Gaps remaining
4. Location of report

Key Rules

• Detect project type first - approach varies
• Generate meaningful docs - not just stubs
• Include examples - always show usage
• Validate existing - docs can go stale
• Write the report - track coverage over time

Commands Summary

Command	Action
discover	Find undocumented features
coverage	Check documentation coverage
gen [feature]	Generate docs for specific feature
all	Update all documentation
validate	Check docs match code

Examples

Generating API Documentation

User says: /doc gen authentication

What happens:

1. Agent detects project type by checking for package.json and finding Node.js project
2. Agent searches codebase for authentication-related functions using grep
3. Agent reads authentication module files to understand implementation
4. Agent generates documentation with purpose, parameters, returns, and usage examples
5. Agent writes to docs/api/authentication.md with code samples
6. Agent validates generated docs match actual function signatures

Result: Complete API documentation created for authentication module with working code examples.

Checking Documentation Coverage

User says: /doc coverage

What happens:

1. Agent detects Python project from pyproject.toml
2. Agent counts total functions/classes with grep -r "^def \|^class "
3. Agent counts documented items by searching for docstrings (""")
4. Agent calculates coverage: 45/67 items = 67% coverage
5. Agent writes report to .agents/doc/2026-02-13-coverage.md
6. Agent lists 22 undocumented functions as gaps

Result: Documentation coverage report shows 67% coverage with specific list of 22 functions needing docs.

Troubleshooting

Problem	Cause	Solution
Coverage calculation inaccurate	Grep pattern doesn't match all code styles	Adjust pattern for project conventions. For Python, check for async def and class methods. For Go, check both func and type definitions.
Generated docs lack examples	Missing context about typical usage	Read existing tests to find usage patterns. Check README for code samples. Ask user for typical use case if unclear.
Discover command finds too many items	Low existing documentation coverage	Prioritize by running discover on specific subdirectories. Focus on public API first, internal utilities later. Use --limit to process in batches.
Validation shows docs out of sync	Code changed after docs written	Re-run gen command for affected features. Consider adding git hook to flag doc updates needed when code changes.

Reference Documents

• references/generation-templates.md
• references/project-types.md
• references/validation-rules.md