doc

boshu2/agentops · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill doc
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

YOU MUST EXECUTE THIS WORKFLOW. Do not just describe it.

skill.md

Doc Skill

YOU MUST EXECUTE THIS WORKFLOW. Do not just describe it.

Generate and validate documentation for any project.

Execution Steps

Given /doc [command] [target]:

Step 1: Detect Project Type

# Check for indicators
ls package.json pyproject.toml go.mod Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null

# Check for existing docs
ls -d docs/ doc/ documentation/ 2>/dev/null

Classify as:

  • CODING: Has source code, needs API docs
  • INFORMATIONAL: Primarily documentation (wiki, knowledge base)
  • OPS: Infrastructure, deployment, runbooks

Step 2: Execute Command

discover - Find undocumented features:

# Find public functions without docstrings (Python)
grep -r "^def " --include="*.py" | grep -v '"""' | head -20

# Find exported functions without comments (Go)
grep -r "^func [A-Z]" --include="*.go" | head -20

coverage - Check documentation coverage:

# Count documented vs undocumented
TOTAL=$(grep -r "^def \|^func \|^class " --include="*.py" --include="*.go" | wc -l)
DOCUMENTED=$(grep -r '"""' --include="*.py" | wc -l)
echo "Coverage: $DOCUMENTED / $TOTAL"

gen [feature] - Generate documentation:

  1. Read the code for the feature
  2. Understand what it does
  3. Generate appropriate documentation
  4. Write to docs/ directory

all - Update all documentation:

  1. Run discover to find gaps
  2. Generate docs for each undocumented feature
  3. Validate existing docs are current

Step 3: Generate Documentation

When generating docs, include:

For Functions/Methods:

## function_name

**Purpose:** What it does

**Parameters:**
- `param1` (type): Description
- `param2` (type): Description

**Returns:** What it returns

**Example:**
```python
result = function_name(arg1, arg2)

Notes: Any important caveats


**For Classes:**
```markdown
## ClassName

**Purpose:** What this class represents

**Attributes:**
- `attr1`: Description
- `attr2`: Description

**Methods:**
- `method1()`: What it does
- `method2()`: What it does

**Usage:**
```python
obj = ClassName()
obj.method1()

### Step 4: Create Code-Map (if requested)

**Write to:** `docs/code-map/`

```markdown
# Code Map: <Project>

## Overview
<High-level architecture>

## Directory Structure

src/ ├── module1/ # Purpose ├── module2/ # Purpose └── utils/ # Shared utilities


## Key Components

### Module 1
- **Purpose:** What it does
- **Entry point:** `main.py`
- **Key files:** `handler.py`, `models.py`

### Module 2
...

## Data Flow
<How data moves through the system>

## Dependencies
<External dependencies and why>

Step 5: Validate Documentation

Check for:

  • Out-of-date docs (code changed, docs didn't)
  • Missing sections (no examples, no parameters)
  • Broken links
  • Inconsistent formatting

Step 6: Write Report

Write to: .agents/doc/YYYY-MM-DD-<target>.md

# Documentation Report: <Target>

**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Project Type:** <CODING/INFORMATIONAL/OPS>

## Coverage
- Total documentable items: <count>
- Documented: <count>
- Coverage: <percentage>%

## Generated
- <list of docs generated>

## Gaps Found
- <undocumented item 1>
- <undocumented item 2>

## Validation Issues
- <issue 1>
- <issue 2>

## Next Steps
- [ ] Document remaining gaps
- [ ] Fix validation issues

Step 7: Report to User

Tell the user:

  1. Documentation coverage percentage
  2. Docs generated/updated
  3. Gaps remaining
  4. Location of report

Key Rules

  • Detect project type first - approach varies
  • Generate meaningful docs - not just stubs
  • Include examples - always show usage
  • Validate existing - docs can go stale
  • Write the report - track coverage over time

Commands Summary

Command Action
discover Find undocumented features
coverage Check documentation coverage
gen [feature] Generate docs for specific feature
all Update all documentation
validate Check docs match code

Examples

Generating API Documentation

User says: /doc gen authentication

What happens:

  1. Agent detects project type by checking for package.json and finding Node.js project
  2. Agent searches codebase for authentication-related functions using grep
  3. Agent reads authentication module files to understand implementation
  4. Agent generates documentation with purpose, parameters, returns, and usage examples
  5. Agent writes to docs/api/authentication.md with code samples
  6. Agent validates generated docs match actual function signatures

Result: Complete API documentation created for authentication module with working code examples.

Checking Documentation Coverage

User says: /doc coverage

What happens:

  1. Agent detects Python project from pyproject.toml
  2. Agent counts total functions/classes with grep -r "^def \|^class "
  3. Agent counts documented items by searching for docstrings (""")
  4. Agent calculates coverage: 45/67 items = 67% coverage
  5. Agent writes report to .agents/doc/2026-02-13-coverage.md
  6. Agent lists 22 undocumented functions as gaps

Result: Documentation coverage report shows 67% coverage with specific list of 22 functions needing docs.

Troubleshooting

Problem Cause Solution
Coverage calculation inaccurate Grep pattern doesn't match all code styles Adjust pattern for project conventions. For Python, check for async def and class methods. For Go, check both func and type definitions.
Generated docs lack examples Missing context about typical usage Read existing tests to find usage patterns. Check README for code samples. Ask user for typical use case if unclear.
Discover command finds too many items Low existing documentation coverage Prioritize by running discover on specific subdirectories. Focus on public API first, internal utilities later. Use --limit to process in batches.
Validation shows docs out of sync Code changed after docs written Re-run gen command for affected features. Consider adding git hook to flag doc updates needed when code changes.

Reference Documents

how to use doc

How to use doc on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add doc
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill doc

The skills CLI fetches doc from GitHub repository boshu2/agentops and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/doc

Reload or restart Cursor to activate doc. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /doc) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.751 reviews
  • James Anderson· Dec 28, 2024

    I recommend doc for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Amelia Zhang· Dec 24, 2024

    doc reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Xiao Ndlovu· Dec 16, 2024

    doc has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for doc matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Xiao Gonzalez· Nov 19, 2024

    Keeps context tight: doc is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Xiao Shah· Nov 7, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: doc is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 3, 2024

    doc reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Xiao Gupta· Oct 26, 2024

    We added doc from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 22, 2024

    I recommend doc for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Xiao Mehta· Oct 10, 2024

    Registry listing for doc matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 51

1 / 6