debugging-dags▌
astronomer/agents · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Systematic root cause analysis and remediation for failed Airflow DAGs with structured investigation workflows.
- ›Guides through four-step diagnosis process: identify the failure, extract error details, gather contextual information, and deliver actionable remediation steps
- ›Categorizes failures into four types (data, code, infrastructure, dependency) to focus investigation and suggest appropriate fixes
- ›Provides ready-to-use CLI commands for log retrieval, run comparison, task clearing,
DAG Diagnosis
You are a data engineer debugging a failed Airflow DAG. Follow this systematic approach to identify the root cause and provide actionable remediation.
Running the CLI
Run all af commands using uvx (no installation required):
uvx --from astro-airflow-mcp af <command>
Throughout this document, af is shorthand for uvx --from astro-airflow-mcp af.
Step 1: Identify the Failure
If a specific DAG was mentioned:
- Run
af runs diagnose <dag_id> <dag_run_id>(if run_id is provided) - If no run_id specified, run
af dags statsto find recent failures
If no DAG was specified:
- Run
af healthto find recent failures across all DAGs - Check for import errors with
af dags errors - Show DAGs with recent failures
- Ask which DAG to investigate further
Step 2: Get the Error Details
Once you have identified a failed task:
- Get task logs using
af tasks logs <dag_id> <dag_run_id> <task_id> - Look for the actual exception - scroll past the Airflow boilerplate to find the real error
- Categorize the failure type:
- Data issue: Missing data, schema change, null values, constraint violation
- Code issue: Bug, syntax error, import failure, type error
- Infrastructure issue: Connection timeout, resource exhaustion, permission denied
- Dependency issue: Upstream failure, external API down, rate limiting
Step 3: Check Context
Gather additional context to understand WHY this happened:
- Recent changes: Was there a code deploy? Check git history if available
- Data volume: Did data volume spike? Run a quick count on source tables
- Upstream health: Did upstream tasks succeed but produce unexpected data?
- Historical pattern: Is this a recurring failure? Check if same task failed before
- Timing: Did this fail at an unusual time? (resource contention, maintenance windows)
Use af runs get <dag_id> <dag_run_id> to compare the failed run against recent successful runs.
On Astro
If you're running on Astro, these additional tools can help with diagnosis:
- Deployment activity log: Check the Astro UI for recent deploys — a failed deploy or recent code change is often the cause of sudden failures
- Astro alerts: Configure alerts in the Astro UI for proactive failure monitoring (DAG failure, task duration, SLA miss)
- Observability: Use the Astro observability dashboard to track DAG health trends and spot recurring issues
On OSS Airflow
- Airflow UI: Use the DAGs page, Graph view, and task logs to inspect recent runs and failures
Step 4: Provide Actionable Output
Structure your diagnosis as:
Root Cause
What actually broke? Be specific - not "the task failed" but "the task failed because column X was null in 15% of rows when the code expected 0%".
Impact Assessment
- What data is affected? Which tables didn't get updated?
- What downstream processes are blocked?
- Is this blocking production dashboards or reports?
Immediate Fix
Specific steps to resolve RIGHT NOW:
- If it's a data issue: SQL to fix or skip bad records
- If it's a code issue: The exact code change needed
- If it's infra: Who to contact or what to restart
Prevention
How to prevent this from happening again:
- Add data quality checks?
- Add better error handling?
- Add alerting for edge cases?
- Update documentation?
Quick Commands
Provide ready-to-use commands:
- To clear and rerun the entire DAG run:
af runs clear <dag_id> <run_id> - To clear and rerun specific failed tasks:
af tasks clear <dag_id> <run_id> <task_ids> -D - To delete a stuck or unwanted run:
af runs delete <dag_id> <run_id>
How to use debugging-dags on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add debugging-dags
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches debugging-dags from GitHub repository astronomer/agents and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate debugging-dags. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /debugging-dags) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★58 reviews- ★★★★★Amelia Gill· Dec 28, 2024
I recommend debugging-dags for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 24, 2024
We added debugging-dags from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Jin Johnson· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: debugging-dags is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Diya Khanna· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in debugging-dags — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Meera Perez· Dec 12, 2024
debugging-dags is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Carlos Martinez· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: debugging-dags is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Diya Verma· Nov 23, 2024
debugging-dags is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Jin Brown· Nov 19, 2024
debugging-dags fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ira Patel· Nov 3, 2024
debugging-dags has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Khan· Nov 3, 2024
Keeps context tight: debugging-dags is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 58