static-code-analysis▌
aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts · updated Apr 8, 2026
Use automated tools to analyze code without executing it, catching bugs, security issues, and style violations early.
Static Code Analysis
Table of Contents
Overview
Use automated tools to analyze code without executing it, catching bugs, security issues, and style violations early.
When to Use
- Enforcing coding standards
- Security vulnerability detection
- Bug prevention
- Code review automation
- CI/CD pipelines
- Pre-commit hooks
- Refactoring assistance
Quick Start
Minimal working example:
// .eslintrc.js
module.exports = {
extends: [
"eslint:recommended",
"plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended",
"plugin:security/recommended",
],
plugins: ["@typescript-eslint", "security", "import"],
rules: {
"no-console": ["warn", { allow: ["error", "warn"] }],
"no-unused-vars": "error",
"prefer-const": "error",
eqeqeq: ["error", "always"],
"no-eval": "error",
"security/detect-object-injection": "warn",
"security/detect-non-literal-regexp": "warn",
"@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any": "warn",
"@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "error",
"import/order": [
"error",
{
groups: [
"builtin",
"external",
"internal",
// ... (see reference guides for full implementation)
Reference Guides
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents |
|---|---|
| ESLint Configuration | ESLint Configuration |
| Python Linting (pylint + mypy) | Python Linting (pylint + mypy) |
| Pre-commit Hooks | Pre-commit Hooks |
| SonarQube Integration | SonarQube Integration |
| Custom AST Analysis | Custom AST Analysis |
| Security Scanning | Security Scanning |
Best Practices
✅ DO
- Run linters in CI/CD
- Use pre-commit hooks
- Configure IDE integration
- Fix issues incrementally
- Document custom rules
- Share configuration across team
- Automate security scanning
❌ DON'T
- Ignore all warnings
- Skip linter setup
- Commit lint violations
- Use overly strict rules initially
- Skip security scans
- Disable rules without reason
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★30 reviews- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 16, 2024
static-code-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Liam Abbas· Dec 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: static-code-analysis is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ira Okafor· Dec 8, 2024
We added static-code-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Nia Agarwal· Nov 27, 2024
Keeps context tight: static-code-analysis is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 7, 2024
static-code-analysis is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 26, 2024
Keeps context tight: static-code-analysis is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Kofi Thompson· Oct 18, 2024
static-code-analysis is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Khan· Sep 21, 2024
Registry listing for static-code-analysis matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Sep 9, 2024
static-code-analysis has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Aug 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: static-code-analysis is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 30