semantic-versioning▌
aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts · updated Apr 8, 2026
Establish semantic versioning practices to maintain consistent version numbering aligned with release significance, enabling automated version management and release notes generation.
Semantic Versioning
Table of Contents
Overview
Establish semantic versioning practices to maintain consistent version numbering aligned with release significance, enabling automated version management and release notes generation.
When to Use
- Package and library releases
- API versioning
- Version bumping automation
- Release note generation
- Breaking change tracking
- Dependency management
- Changelog management
Quick Start
Minimal working example:
# package.json
{
"name": "my-awesome-package",
"version": "1.2.3",
"description": "An awesome package",
"main": "dist/index.js",
"repository": { "type": "git", "url": "https://github.com/org/repo.git" },
"scripts": { "release": "semantic-release" },
"devDependencies":
{
"semantic-release": "^21.0.0",
"@semantic-release/changelog": "^6.0.0",
"@semantic-release/git": "^10.0.0",
"@semantic-release/github": "^9.0.0",
"conventional-changelog-cli": "^3.0.0",
},
}
Reference Guides
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents |
|---|---|
| Semantic Versioning Configuration | Semantic Versioning Configuration |
| Conventional Commits Format | Conventional Commits Format |
| Semantic Release Configuration | Semantic Release Configuration |
| Version Bumping Script | Version Bumping Script |
| Changelog Generation | Changelog Generation |
Best Practices
✅ DO
- Follow strict MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format
- Use conventional commits
- Automate version bumping
- Generate changelogs automatically
- Tag releases in git
- Document breaking changes
- Use prerelease versions for testing
❌ DON'T
- Manually bump versions inconsistently
- Skip breaking change documentation
- Use arbitrary version numbering
- Mix features in patch releases
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★52 reviews- ★★★★★Noor Agarwal· Dec 24, 2024
We added semantic-versioning from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Anaya Reddy· Dec 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: semantic-versioning is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 8, 2024
semantic-versioning reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 27, 2024
I recommend semantic-versioning for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Zara Tandon· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: semantic-versioning is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Advait Rahman· Nov 7, 2024
We added semantic-versioning from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Aisha Johnson· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: semantic-versioning is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Advait Diallo· Oct 26, 2024
semantic-versioning fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Layla Abebe· Oct 26, 2024
semantic-versioning is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 18, 2024
Useful defaults in semantic-versioning — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 52