ml-model-explanation▌
aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Model explainability makes machine learning decisions transparent and interpretable, enabling trust, compliance, debugging, and actionable insights from predictions.
ML Model Explanation
Model explainability makes machine learning decisions transparent and interpretable, enabling trust, compliance, debugging, and actionable insights from predictions.
Explanation Techniques
- Feature Importance: Global feature contribution to predictions
- SHAP Values: Game theory-based feature attribution
- LIME: Local linear approximations for individual predictions
- Partial Dependence Plots: Feature relationship with predictions
- Attention Maps: Visualization of model focus areas
- Surrogate Models: Simpler interpretable approximations
Explainability Types
- Global: Overall model behavior and patterns
- Local: Explanation for individual predictions
- Feature-Level: Which features matter most
- Model-Level: How different components interact
Python Implementation
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier, GradientBoostingClassifier
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier, plot_tree
from sklearn.inspection import partial_dependence, permutation_importance
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
print("=== 1. Feature Importance Analysis ===")
# Create dataset
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=20, n_informative=10,
n_redundant=5, random_state=42)
feature_names = [f'Feature_{i}' for i in range(20)]
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)
# Train models
rf_model = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
rf_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
gb_model = GradientBoostingClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
gb_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
# Feature importance methods
print("\n=== Feature Importance Comparison ===")
# 1. Impurity-based importance (default)
impurity_importance = rf_model.feature_importances_
# 2. Permutation importance
perm_importance = permutation_importance(rf_model, X_test, y_test, n_repeats=10, random_state=42)
# Create comparison dataframe
importance_df = pd.DataFrame({
'Feature': feature_names,
'Impurity': impurity_importance,
'Permutation': perm_importance.importances_mean
}).sort_values('Impurity', ascending=False)
print("\nTop 10 Most Important Features (by Impurity):")
print(importance_df.head(10)[['Feature', 'Impurity']])
# 2. SHAP-like Feature Attribution
print("\n=== SHAP-like Feature Attribution ===")
class SimpleShapCalculator:
def __init__(self, model, X_background):
self.model = model
self.X_background = X_background
self.baseline = model.predict_proba(X_background.mean(axis=0).reshape(1, -1))[0]
def predict_difference(self, X_sample):
"""Get prediction difference from baseline"""
pred = self.model.predict_proba(X_sample)[0]
return pred - self.baseline
def calculate_shap_values(self, X_instance, n_iterations=100):
"""Approximate SHAP values"""
shap_values = np.zeros(X_instance.shape[1])
n_features = X_instance.shape[1]
for i in range(n_iterations):
# Random feature subset
subset_mask = np.random.random(n_features) > 0.5
# With and without feature
X_with = X_instance.copy()
X_without = X_instance.copy()
X_without[0, ~subset_mask] = self.X_background[0, ~subset_mask]
# Marginal contribution
contribution = (self.predict_difference(X_with)[1] -
self.predict_difference(X_without)[1])
shap_values[~subset_mask] += contribution / n_iterations
return shap_values
shap_calc = SimpleShapCalculator(rf_model, X_train)
# Calculate SHAP values for a sample
sample_idx = 0
shap_vals = shap_calc.calculate_shap_values(X_test[sample_idx:sample_idx+1], n_iterations=50)
print(f"\nSHAP Values for Sample {sample_idx}:")
shap_df = pd.DataFrame({
'Feature': feature_names,
'SHAP_Value': shap_vals
}).sort_values('SHAP_Value', key=abs, ascending=False)
print(shap_df.head(10)[['Feature', 'SHAP_Value']])
# 3. Partial Dependence Analysis
print("\n=== 3. Partial Dependence Analysis ===")
# Calculate partial dependence for top features
top_features = importance_df['Feature'].head(3).values
top_feature_indices = [feature_names.index(f) for f in top_features]
pd_data = {}
for feature_idx in top_feature_indices:
pd_result = partial_dependence(rf_model, X_test, [feature_idx])
pd_data[feature_names[feature_idx]How to use ml-model-explanation on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add ml-model-explanation
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches ml-model-explanation from GitHub repository aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate ml-model-explanation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /ml-model-explanation) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★59 reviews- ★★★★★Evelyn Srinivasan· Dec 28, 2024
ml-model-explanation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 24, 2024
ml-model-explanation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Yuki Haddad· Dec 24, 2024
ml-model-explanation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Aditi Desai· Dec 16, 2024
ml-model-explanation reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Yuki Mensah· Dec 12, 2024
ml-model-explanation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Aditi Nasser· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend ml-model-explanation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Okafor· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for ml-model-explanation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for ml-model-explanation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Hassan Singh· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ml-model-explanation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Abbas· Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in ml-model-explanation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 59