ml-model-explanation

Model explainability makes machine learning decisions transparent and interpretable, enabling trust, compliance, debugging, and actionable insights from predictions.

aj-geddes/useful-ai-promptsUpdated Apr 8, 2026

Works with

Claude CodeCursorClineWindsurfCodexGooseGitHub CopilotZed

0

total installs

0

this week

161

GitHub stars

0

upvotes

Install Skill

Run in your terminal

$npx skills add https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill ml-model-explanation

0

installs

0

this week

161

stars

Installation Guide

How to use ml-model-explanation on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your machine
  • Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with node --version
  • Active project directory where you want to add ml-model-explanation
2

Run the install command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts --skill ml-model-explanation

Fetches ml-model-explanation from aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ────────────────
│ · Cline · Codex · Goose · Windsurf
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ · Cursor · Aider · Continue
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/ml-model-explanation

Restart Cursor to activate ml-model-explanation. Access via /ml-model-explanation in your agent's command palette.

Security Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.

Documentation

ML Model Explanation

Model explainability makes machine learning decisions transparent and interpretable, enabling trust, compliance, debugging, and actionable insights from predictions.

Explanation Techniques

  • Feature Importance: Global feature contribution to predictions
  • SHAP Values: Game theory-based feature attribution
  • LIME: Local linear approximations for individual predictions
  • Partial Dependence Plots: Feature relationship with predictions
  • Attention Maps: Visualization of model focus areas
  • Surrogate Models: Simpler interpretable approximations

Explainability Types

  • Global: Overall model behavior and patterns
  • Local: Explanation for individual predictions
  • Feature-Level: Which features matter most
  • Model-Level: How different components interact

Python Implementation

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.datasets import make_classification
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier, GradientBoostingClassifier
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier, plot_tree
from sklearn.inspection import partial_dependence, permutation_importance
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')

print("=== 1. Feature Importance Analysis ===")

# Create dataset
X, y = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=20, n_informative=10,
                          n_redundant=5, random_state=42)
feature_names = [f'Feature_{i}' for i in range(20)]
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)

# Train models
rf_model = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
rf_model.fit(X_train, y_train)

gb_model = GradientBoostingClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
gb_model.fit(X_train, y_train)

# Feature importance methods
print("\n=== Feature Importance Comparison ===")

# 1. Impurity-based importance (default)
impurity_importance = rf_model.feature_importances_

# 2. Permutation importance
perm_importance = permutation_importance(rf_model, X_test, y_test, n_repeats=10, random_state=42)

# Create comparison dataframe
importance_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Feature': feature_names,
    'Impurity': impurity_importance,
    'Permutation': perm_importance.importances_mean
}).sort_values('Impurity', ascending=False)

print("\nTop 10 Most Important Features (by Impurity):")
print(importance_df.head(10)[['Feature', 'Impurity']])

# 2. SHAP-like Feature Attribution
print("\n=== SHAP-like Feature Attribution ===")

class SimpleShapCalculator:
    def __init__(self, model, X_background):
        self.model = model
        self.X_background = X_background
        self.baseline = model.predict_proba(X_background.mean(axis=0).reshape(1, -1))[0]

    def predict_difference(self, X_sample):
        """Get prediction difference from baseline"""
        pred = self.model.predict_proba(X_sample)[0]
        return pred - self.baseline

    def calculate_shap_values(self, X_instance, n_iterations=100):
        """Approximate SHAP values"""
        shap_values = np.zeros(X_instance.shape[1])
        n_features = X_instance.shape[1]

        for i in range(n_iterations):
            # Random feature subset
            subset_mask = np.random.random(n_features) > 0.5

            # With and without feature
            X_with = X_instance.copy()
            X_without = X_instance.copy()
            X_without[0, ~subset_mask] = self.X_background[0, ~subset_mask]

            # Marginal contribution
            contribution = (self.predict_difference(X_with)[1] -
                          self.predict_difference(X_without)[1])

            shap_values[~subset_mask] += contribution / n_iterations

        return shap_values

shap_calc = SimpleShapCalculator(rf_model, X_train)

# Calculate SHAP values for a sample
sample_idx = 0
shap_vals = shap_calc.calculate_shap_values(X_test[sample_idx:sample_idx+1], n_iterations=50)

print(f"\nSHAP Values for Sample {sample_idx}:")
shap_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'Feature': feature_names,
    'SHAP_Value': shap_vals
}).sort_values('SHAP_Value', key=abs, ascending=False)

print(shap_df.head(10)[['Feature', 'SHAP_Value']])

# 3. Partial Dependence Analysis
print("\n=== 3. Partial Dependence Analysis ===")

# Calculate partial dependence for top features
top_features = importance_df['Feature'].head(3).values
top_feature_indices = [feature_names.index(f) for f in top_features]

pd_data = {}
for feature_idx in top_feature_indices:
    pd_result = partial_dependence(rf_model, X_test, [feature_idx])
    pd_data[feature_names[feature_idx]

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

Get started →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Steps

  1. 1Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use when

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid when

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Related Skills

Reviews

4.659 reviews
  • E
    Evelyn SrinivasanDec 28, 2024

    ml-model-explanation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • C
    Chaitanya PatilDec 24, 2024

    ml-model-explanation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Y
    Yuki HaddadDec 24, 2024

    ml-model-explanation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • A
    Aditi DesaiDec 16, 2024

    ml-model-explanation reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Y
    Yuki MensahDec 12, 2024

    ml-model-explanation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • A
    Aditi NasserDec 4, 2024

    I recommend ml-model-explanation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Y
    Yusuf OkaforNov 19, 2024

    Registry listing for ml-model-explanation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • P
    Piyush GNov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for ml-model-explanation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • H
    Hassan SinghNov 15, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ml-model-explanation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • E
    Evelyn AbbasNov 11, 2024

    Useful defaults in ml-model-explanation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 59

1 / 6

Discussion

Comments — not star reviews
  • No comments yet — start the thread.