m11-ecosystem

actionbook/rust-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/actionbook/rust-skills --skill m11-ecosystem
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

!grep -A 100 '^\[dependencies\]' Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null | head -30 || echo "No Cargo.toml found"

skill.md

Current Dependencies (Auto-Injected)

!grep -A 100 '^\[dependencies\]' Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null | head -30 || echo "No Cargo.toml found"


Ecosystem Integration

Layer 2: Design Choices

Core Question

What's the right crate for this job, and how should it integrate?

Before adding dependencies:

  • Is there a standard solution?
  • What's the maintenance status?
  • What's the API stability?

Integration Decision → Implementation

Need Choice Crates
Serialization Derive-based serde, serde_json
Async runtime tokio or async-std tokio (most popular)
HTTP client Ergonomic reqwest
HTTP server Modern axum, actix-web
Database SQL or ORM sqlx, diesel
CLI parsing Derive-based clap
Error handling App vs lib anyhow, thiserror
Logging Facade tracing, log

Thinking Prompt

Before adding a dependency:

  1. Is it well-maintained?

    • Recent commits?
    • Active issue response?
    • Breaking changes frequency?
  2. What's the scope?

    • Do you need the full crate or just a feature?
    • Can feature flags reduce bloat?
  3. How does it integrate?

    • Trait-based or concrete types?
    • Sync or async?
    • What bounds does it require?

Trace Up ↑

To domain constraints (Layer 3):

"Which HTTP framework should I use?"
    ↑ Ask: What are the performance requirements?
    ↑ Check: domain-web (latency, throughput needs)
    ↑ Check: Team expertise (familiarity with framework)
Question Trace To Ask
Framework choice domain-* What constraints matter?
Library vs build domain-* What's the deployment model?
API design domain-* Who are the consumers?

Trace Down ↓

To implementation (Layer 1):

"Integrate external crate"
    ↓ m04-zero-cost: Trait bounds and generics
    ↓ m06-error-handling: Error type compatibility

"FFI integration"
    ↓ unsafe-checker: Safety requirements
    ↓ m12-lifecycle: Resource cleanup

Quick Reference

Language Interop

Integration Crate/Tool Use Case
C/C++ → Rust bindgen Auto-generate bindings
Rust → C cbindgen Export C headers
Python ↔ Rust pyo3 Python extensions
Node.js ↔ Rust napi-rs Node addons
WebAssembly wasm-bindgen Browser/WASI

Cargo Features

Feature Purpose
[features] Optional functionality
default = [...] Default features
feature = "serde" Conditional deps
[workspace] Multi-crate projects

Error Code Reference

Error Cause Fix
E0433 Can't find crate Add to Cargo.toml
E0603 Private item Check crate docs
Feature not enabled Optional feature Enable in features
Version conflict Incompatible deps cargo update or pin
Duplicate types Different crate versions Unify in workspace

Crate Selection Criteria

Criterion Good Sign Warning Sign
Maintenance Recent commits Years inactive
Community Active issues/PRs No response
Documentation Examples, API docs Minimal docs
Stability Semantic versioning Frequent breaking
Dependencies Minimal, well-known Heavy, obscure

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern Why Bad Better
extern crate Outdated (2018+) Just use
#[macro_use] Global pollution Explicit import
Wildcard deps * Unpredictable Specific versions
Too many deps Supply chain risk Evaluate necessity
Vendoring everything Maintenance burden Trust crates.io

Related Skills

When See
Error type design m06-error-handling
Trait integration m04-zero-cost
FFI safety unsafe-checker
Resource management m12-lifecycle

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.738 reviews
  • Diya Desai· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in m11-ecosystem — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Liam Ramirez· Dec 24, 2024

    Keeps context tight: m11-ecosystem is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Zaid Diallo· Dec 20, 2024

    m11-ecosystem fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 16, 2024

    We added m11-ecosystem from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Harper Chawla· Dec 4, 2024

    m11-ecosystem has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 27, 2024

    m11-ecosystem fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Diya Sanchez· Nov 15, 2024

    We added m11-ecosystem from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Noah Farah· Nov 15, 2024

    m11-ecosystem is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in m11-ecosystem — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 26, 2024

    Registry listing for m11-ecosystem matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 38

1 / 4