domain-web
Layer 3: Domain Constraints
Works with
0
total installs
0
this week
974
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
974
stars
Installation Guide
How to use domain-web on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
domain-web
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches domain-web from actionbook/rust-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate domain-web. Access via /domain-web in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
Web Domain
Layer 3: Domain Constraints
Domain Constraints → Design Implications
| Domain Rule | Design Constraint | Rust Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Stateless HTTP | No request-local globals | State in extractors |
| Concurrency | Handle many connections | Async, Send + Sync |
| Latency SLA | Fast response | Efficient ownership |
| Security | Input validation | Type-safe extractors |
| Observability | Request tracing | tracing + tower layers |
Critical Constraints
Async by Default
RULE: Web handlers must not block
WHY: Block one task = block many requests
RUST: async/await, spawn_blocking for CPU work
State Management
RULE: Shared state must be thread-safe
WHY: Handlers run on any thread
RUST: Arc<T>, Arc<RwLock<T>> for mutable
Request Lifecycle
RULE: Resources live only for request duration
WHY: Memory management, no leaks
RUST: Extractors, proper ownership
Trace Down ↓
From constraints to design (Layer 2):
"Need shared application state"
↓ m07-concurrency: Use Arc for thread-safe sharing
↓ m02-resource: Arc<RwLock<T>> for mutable state
"Need request validation"
↓ m05-type-driven: Validated extractors
↓ m06-error-handling: IntoResponse for errors
"Need middleware stack"
↓ m12-lifecycle: Tower layers
↓ m04-zero-cost: Trait-based composition
Framework Comparison
| Framework | Style | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| axum | Functional, tower | Modern APIs |
| actix-web | Actor-based | High performance |
| warp | Filter composition | Composable APIs |
| rocket | Macro-driven | Rapid development |
Key Crates
| Purpose | Crate |
|---|---|
| HTTP server | axum, actix-web |
| HTTP client | reqwest |
| JSON | serde_json |
| Auth/JWT | jsonwebtoken |
| Session | tower-sessions |
| Database | sqlx, diesel |
| Middleware | tower |
Design Patterns
| Pattern | Purpose | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Extractors | Request parsing | State(db), Json(payload) |
| Error response | Unified errors | impl IntoResponse |
| Middleware | Cross-cutting | Tower layers |
| Shared state | App config | Arc<AppState> |
Code Pattern: Axum Handler
async fn handler(
State(db): State<Arc<DbPool>>,
Json(payload): Json<CreateUser>,
) -> Result<Json<User>, AppError> {
let user = db.create_user(&payload).await?;
Ok(Json(user))
}
// Error handling
impl IntoResponse for AppError {
fn into_response(self) -> Response {
let (status, message) = match self {
Self::NotFound => (StatusCode::NOT_FOUND, "Not found"),
Self::Internal(_) => (StatusCode::INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, "Internal error"),
};
(status, Json(json!({"error": message}))).into_response()
}
}
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Domain Violation | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Blocking in handler | Latency spike | spawn_blocking |
| Rc in state | Not Send + Sync | Use Arc |
| No validation | Security risk | Type-safe extractors |
| No error response | Bad UX | IntoResponse impl |
Trace to Layer 1
| Constraint | Layer 2 Pattern | Layer 1 Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Async handlers | Async/await | tokio runtime |
| Thread-safe state | Shared state | Arc, Arc<RwLock> |
| Request lifecycle | Extractors | Ownership via From |
| Middleware | Tower layers | Trait-based composition |
Related Skills
| When | See |
|---|---|
| Async patterns | m07-concurrency |
| State management | m02-resource |
| Error handling | m06-error-handling |
| Middleware design | m12-lifecycle |
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
domain-hunter
4resciencelab/opc-skills
web-accessibility
56supercent-io/skills-template
web-design-guidelines
8skillcreatorai/ai-agent-skills
web-search
7jwynia/agent-skills
exa-web-search-free
5sundial-org/awesome-openclaw-skills
scrapy-web-scraping
5mindrally/skills
Reviews
- AAarav Farah★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
We added domain-web from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- NNia Kapoor★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: domain-web is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: domain-web is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- AArjun Jackson★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
I recommend domain-web for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- AArjun White★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
domain-web reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- CCamila Wang★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
domain-web has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- OOshnikdeep★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
domain-web has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- KKofi Taylor★★★★★Oct 18, 2024
Useful defaults in domain-web — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- AArjun Bansal★★★★★Oct 10, 2024
Registry listing for domain-web matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- LLuis Wang★★★★★Oct 10, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: domain-web is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 31
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.