dotnet-slopwatch▌
aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Use this skill constantly. Every time an LLM (including Claude) makes changes to:
Slopwatch: LLM Anti-Cheat for .NET
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill constantly. Every time an LLM (including Claude) makes changes to:
- C# source files (.cs)
- Project files (.csproj)
- Props files (Directory.Build.props, Directory.Packages.props)
- Test files
Run slopwatch to validate the changes don't introduce "slop."
What is Slop?
"Slop" refers to shortcuts LLMs take that make tests pass or builds succeed without actually solving the underlying problem. These are reward hacking behaviors - the LLM optimizes for apparent success rather than real fixes.
Common Slop Patterns
| Pattern | Example | Why It's Bad |
|---|---|---|
| Disabled tests | [Fact(Skip="flaky")] |
Hides failures instead of fixing them |
| Warning suppression | #pragma warning disable CS8618 |
Silences compiler without fixing issue |
| Empty catch blocks | catch (Exception) { } |
Swallows errors, hides bugs |
| Arbitrary delays | await Task.Delay(1000); |
Masks race conditions, makes tests slow |
| Project-level suppression | <NoWarn>CS1591</NoWarn> |
Disables warnings project-wide |
| CPM bypass | Version="1.0.0" inline |
Undermines central package management |
Never accept these patterns. If an LLM introduces slop, reject the change and require a proper fix.
Installation
As a Local Tool (Recommended)
Add to .config/dotnet-tools.json:
{
"version": 1,
"isRoot": true,
"tools": {
"slopwatch.cmd": {
"version": "0.2.0",
"commands": ["slopwatch"],
"rollForward": false
}
}
}
Then restore:
dotnet tool restore
As a Global Tool
dotnet tool install --global Slopwatch.Cmd
First-Time Setup: Establish a Baseline
Before using slopwatch on an existing project, create a baseline of current issues:
# Initialize baseline from existing code
slopwatch init
# This creates .slopwatch/baseline.json
git add .slopwatch/baseline.json
git commit -m "Add slopwatch baseline"
Why baseline? Legacy code may have existing issues. The baseline ensures slopwatch only catches new slop being introduced, not pre-existing technical debt.
Usage During LLM Sessions
After Every Code Change
Run slopwatch after any LLM-generated code modification:
# Analyze for new issues (uses baseline)
slopwatch analyze
# Use strict mode - fail on warnings too
slopwatch analyze --fail-on warning
When Slopwatch Flags an Issue
Do not ignore it. Instead:
- Understand why the LLM took the shortcut
- Request a proper fix - be specific about what's wrong
- Verify the fix doesn't introduce different slop
# Example: LLM disabled a test
❌ SW001 [Error]: Disabled test detected
File: tests/MyApp.Tests/OrderTests.cs:45
Pattern: [Fact(Skip="Test is flaky")]
# Correct response: Ask for actual fix
"This test was disabled instead of fixed. Please investigate why
it's flaky and fix the underlying timing/race condition issue."
Updating the Baseline (Rare)
Only update the baseline when slop is truly justified and documented:
# Add current detections to baseline (use sparingly!)
slopwatch analyze --update-baseline
Justification examples:
- Third-party library forces a pattern (e.g., must suppress specific warning)
- Intentional delay for rate limiting (not test flakiness)
- Generated code that can't be modified
Document why in a code comment when updating baseline.
Claude Code Hook Integration
Add slopwatch as a hook to automatically validate every edit. Create or update .claude/settings.json:
{
"hooks": {
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Write|Edit|MultiEdit",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "slopwatch analyze -d . --hook",
"timeout": 60000
}
]
}
]
}
}
The --hook flag:
- Only analyzes git dirty files (fast, even on large repos)
- Outputs errors to stderr in readable format
- Blocks the edit on warnings/errors (exit code 2)
- Claude sees the error and can fix it immediately
CI/CD Integration
Add slopwatch to your CI pipeline as a quality gate:
GitHub Actions
jobs:
slopwatch:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup .NET
uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
with:
dotnet-version: '9.0.x'
- name: Install Slopwatch
run: dotnet tool install --global Slopwatch.Cmd
- name: Run Slopwatch
run: slopwatch analyze -d . --fail-on warning
Azure Pipelines
- task: DotNetCoreCLI@2
displayName: 'Install Slopwatch'
inputs:
command: 'custom'
custom: 'tool'
arguments: 'install --global Slopwatch.Cmd'
- script: slopwatch analyze -d . --fail-on warning
displayName: 'Slopwatch Analysis'
Detection Rules
| Rule | Severity | What It Catches |
|---|---|---|
| SW001 | Error | Disabled tests (Skip=, Ignore, #if false) |
| SW002 | Warning | Warning suppression (#pragma warning disable, SuppressMessage) |
| SW003 | Error | Empty catch blocks that swallow exceptions |
| SW004 | Warning | Arbitrary delays in tests (Task.Delay, Thread.Sleep) |
| SW005 | Warning | Project file slop (NoWarn, TreatWarningsAsErrors=false) |
| SW006 | Warning | CPM bypass (VersionOverride, inline Version attributes) |
Configuration
Create .slopwatch/slopwatch.json to customize:
{
"minSeverity": "warning",
"rules": {
"SW001": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW002": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW003": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW004": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW005": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" },
"SW006": { "enabled": true, "severity": "warning" }
},
"exclude": [
"**/Generated/**",
"**/obj/**",
"**/bin/**"
]
}
Strict Mode (Recommended for LLM Sessions)
For maximum protection during LLM coding sessions, elevate all rules to errors:
{
"minSeverity": "warning",
"rules": {
"SW001": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW002": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW003": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW004": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW005": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" },
"SW006": { "enabled": true, "severity": "error" }
}
}
The Philosophy: Zero Tolerance for New Slop
- Baseline captures legacy - Existing issues are acknowledged but isolated
- New slop is blocked - Any new shortcut fails the build/edit
- Exceptions require justification - If you must update baseline, document why
- LLMs are not special - The same rules apply to human and AI-generated code
The goal is to prevent the gradual accumulation of technical debt that occurs when LLMs optimize for "make the te
How to use dotnet-slopwatch on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add dotnet-slopwatch
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches dotnet-slopwatch from GitHub repository aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate dotnet-slopwatch. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /dotnet-slopwatch) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★47 reviews- ★★★★★Hassan Brown· Dec 28, 2024
dotnet-slopwatch has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Aisha Kim· Dec 24, 2024
dotnet-slopwatch fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Jain· Dec 16, 2024
We added dotnet-slopwatch from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in dotnet-slopwatch — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Amina Sethi· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for dotnet-slopwatch matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ira Okafor· Nov 19, 2024
dotnet-slopwatch fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Mei Taylor· Nov 15, 2024
dotnet-slopwatch has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Aarav Bansal· Nov 7, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: dotnet-slopwatch is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 3, 2024
dotnet-slopwatch is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Mia Rao· Oct 26, 2024
dotnet-slopwatch has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 47