typescript-best-practices▌
0xbigboss/claude-code · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
TypeScript patterns for type-first development, making illegal states unrepresentable, and exhaustive handling.
- ›Use discriminated unions, branded types, and const assertions to encode business rules in the type system and prevent invalid states at compile time
- ›Validate at system boundaries with Zod schemas as single source of truth; infer TypeScript types automatically to keep types and validation in sync
- ›Enforce exhaustive handling with never checks in switch statements and default
TypeScript Best Practices
Follows type-first, functional, and error handling patterns from CLAUDE.md. This skill covers language-specific idioms only.
Pair with React Best Practices
When working with React components (.tsx, .jsx files or @react imports), always load react-best-practices alongside this skill. This skill covers TypeScript fundamentals; React-specific patterns (effects, hooks, refs, component design) are in the dedicated React skill.
Make Illegal States Unrepresentable
Use the type system to prevent invalid states at compile time.
Discriminated unions for mutually exclusive states:
// Good: only valid combinations possible
type RequestState<T> =
| { status: 'idle' }
| { status: 'loading' }
| { status: 'success'; data: T }
| { status: 'error'; error: Error };
// Bad: allows invalid combinations like { loading: true, error: Error }
type RequestState<T> = {
loading: boolean;
data?: T;
error?: Error;
};
Branded types for domain primitives:
type UserId = string & { readonly __brand: 'UserId' };
type OrderId = string & { readonly __brand: 'OrderId' };
// Compiler prevents passing OrderId where UserId expected
function getUser(id: UserId): Promise<User> { /* ... */ }
Const assertions for literal unions:
const ROLES = ['admin', 'user', 'guest'] as const;
type Role = typeof ROLES[number]; // 'admin' | 'user' | 'guest'
// Array and type stay in sync automatically
function isValidRole(role: string): role is Role {
return ROLES.includes(role as Role);
}
Exhaustive switch with never check:
type Status = "active" | "inactive";
function processStatus(status: Status): string {
switch (status) {
case "active":
return "processing";
case "inactive":
return "skipped";
default: {
const _exhaustive: never = status;
throw new Error(`unhandled status: ${_exhaustive}`);
}
}
}
Runtime Validation with Zod
- Define schemas as single source of truth; infer TypeScript types with
z.infer<>. Avoid duplicating types and schemas. - Use
safeParsefor user input where failure is expected; useparseat trust boundaries where invalid data is a bug. - Compose schemas with
.extend(),.pick(),.omit(),.merge()for DRY definitions. - Add
.transform()for data normalization at parse time (trim strings, parse dates).
import { z } from "zod";
const UserSchema = z.object({
id: z.string().uuid(),
email: z.string().email(),
name: z.string().min(1),
createdAt: z.string().transform((s) => new Date(s)),
});
type User = z.infer<typeof UserSchema>;
// Strict parsing at trust boundaries — throws if API contract violated
export async function fetchUser(id: string): Promise<User> {
const response = await fetch(`/api/users/${id}`);
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(`fetch user ${id} failed: ${response.status}`);
}
return UserSchema.parse(await response.json());
}
// Caller handles both success and error from user input
const result = UserSchema.safeParse(formData);
if (!result.success) {
setErrors(result.error.flatten().fieldErrors);
return;
}
Optional: type-fest
For advanced type utilities beyond TypeScript builtins, consider type-fest:
Opaque<T, Token>- cleaner branded types than manual& { __brand }patternPartialDeep<T>- recursive partial for nested objectsReadonlyDeep<T>- recursive readonly for immutable dataSetRequired<T, K>/SetOptional<T, K>- targeted field modificationsSimplify<T>- flatten complex intersection types in IDE tooltips
import type { Opaque, PartialDeep } from 'type-fest';
type UserId = Opaque<string, 'UserId'>;
type UserPatch = PartialDeep<User>;
How to use typescript-best-practices on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add typescript-best-practices
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches typescript-best-practices from GitHub repository 0xbigboss/claude-code and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate typescript-best-practices. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /typescript-best-practices) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★28 reviews- ★★★★★Hana Sharma· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: typescript-best-practices is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 24, 2024
typescript-best-practices reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Aditi Johnson· Dec 20, 2024
typescript-best-practices is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Omar Bansal· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for typescript-best-practices matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Jackson· Nov 19, 2024
We added typescript-best-practices from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend typescript-best-practices for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Naina Zhang· Nov 3, 2024
Useful defaults in typescript-best-practices — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Soo Abebe· Oct 22, 2024
I recommend typescript-best-practices for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Soo Rao· Oct 10, 2024
typescript-best-practices fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 6, 2024
Useful defaults in typescript-best-practices — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 28