Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior, not to hit coverage targets.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiongolang-testingExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches golang-testing from samber/cc-skills-golang and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate golang-testing. Access via /golang-testing in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
9
total installs
9
this week
1.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
9
installs
9
this week
1.0K
stars
Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior, not to hit coverage targets.
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for test strategy design and failure analysis. Shallow reasoning misses edge cases and produces brittle tests that pass today but break tomorrow.
Modes:
gotests to scaffold table-driven tests, then enrich with edge cases and error paths.t.Parallel(), implementation-detail coupling). Launch up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) unit test quality and coverage gaps, (2) integration test isolation and build tags, (3) goroutine leaks and race conditions.Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testingskill takes precedence.
This skill guides the creation of production-ready tests for Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, fast, and reliable tests.
name field passed to t.Run//go:build integration) to separate from unit testst.Parallel() when possiblegoleak.VerifyTestMain in TestMain to detect goroutine leaks// package_test.go - tests in same package (white-box, access unexported)
package mypackage
// mypackage_test.go - tests in test package (black-box, public API only)
package mypackage_test
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) { ... } // function test
func TestMyStruct_MyMethod(t *testing.T) { ... } // method test
func BenchmarkAdd(b *testing.B) { ... } // benchmark
func ExampleAdd() { ... } // example
Table-driven tests are the idiomatic Go way to test multiple scenarios. Always name each test case.
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
quantity int
unitPrice float64
expected float64
}{
{
name: "single item",
quantity: 1,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 10.0,
},
{
name: "bulk discount - 100 items",
quantity: 100,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 900.0, // 10% discount
},
{
name: "zero quantity",
quantity: 0,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 0.0,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)
if got != tt.expected {
t.Errorf("CalculatePrice(%d, %.2f) = %.2f, want %.2f",
tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice, got, tt.expected)
}
})
}
}
Unit tests should be fast (< 1ms), isolated (no external dependencies), and deterministic.
Use httptest for handler tests with table-driven patterns. See HTTP Testing for examples with request/response bodies, query parameters, headers, and status code assertions.
Use go.uber.org/goleak to detect leaking goroutines, especially for concurrent code:
import (
"testing"
"go.uber.org/goleak"
)
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
goleak.VerifyTestMain(m)
}
To exclude specific goroutine stacks (for known leaks or library goroutines):
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
goleak.VerifyTestMain(m,
goleak.IgnoreCurrent(),
)
}
Or per-test:
func TestWorkerPool(t *testing.T) {
defer goleak.VerifyNone(t)
// ... test code ...
}
Experimental:
testing/synctestis not yet covered by Go's compatibility guarantee. Its API may change in future releases. For stable alternatives, useclockwork(see Mocking).
testing/synctest (Go 1.24+) provides deterministic time for concurrent code testing. Time advances only when all goroutines are blocked, making ordering predictable.
When to use synctest instead of real time:
import (
"testing"
"time"
"testing/synctest"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func TestChannelTimeout(t *testing.T) {
synctest.Run(func(t *testing.T) {
is := assert.New(t)
ch := make(chan int, 1)
go func() {
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
ch <- 42
}()
select {
case v := <-ch:
is.Equal(42, v)
case <-time.After(100 * time.Millisecond):
t.Fatal("timeout occurred")
}
})
}
Key differences in synctest:
time.Sleep advances synthetic time instantly when the goroutine blockstime.After fires when synthetic time reaches the durationFor tests that may hang, use a timeout helper that panics with caller location. See Helpers.
→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for advanced benchmarking: b.Loop() (Go 1.24+), benchstat, profiling from benchmarks, and CI regression detection.
Write benchmarks to measure performance and detect regressions:
func BenchmarkStringConcatenation(b *testing.B) {
b.Run("plus-operator", func(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
result := "a" + "b" + "c"
_ = result
}
})
b.Run(Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
tomlord1122/tomtom-skill
jwynia/agent-skills
mindrally/skills
github/awesome-copilot
kostja94/marketing-skills
wispbit-ai/skills
Keeps context tight: golang-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for golang-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
golang-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: golang-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added golang-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
golang-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend golang-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
We added golang-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: golang-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
golang-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 49