golang-testing▌
samber/cc-skills-golang · updated Apr 8, 2026
Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior, not to hit coverage targets.
Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior, not to hit coverage targets.
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for test strategy design and failure analysis. Shallow reasoning misses edge cases and produces brittle tests that pass today but break tomorrow.
Modes:
- Write mode — generating new tests for existing or new code. Work sequentially through the code under test; use
goteststo scaffold table-driven tests, then enrich with edge cases and error paths. - Review mode — reviewing a PR's test changes. Focus on the diff: check coverage of new behaviour, assertion quality, table-driven structure, and absence of flakiness patterns. Sequential.
- Audit mode — auditing an existing test suite for gaps, flakiness, or bad patterns (order-dependent tests, missing
t.Parallel(), implementation-detail coupling). Launch up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) unit test quality and coverage gaps, (2) integration test isolation and build tags, (3) goroutine leaks and race conditions. - Debug mode — a test is failing or flaky. Work sequentially: reproduce reliably, isolate the failing assertion, trace the root cause in production code or test setup.
Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testingskill takes precedence.
Go Testing Best Practices
This skill guides the creation of production-ready tests for Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, fast, and reliable tests.
Best Practices Summary
- Table-driven tests MUST use named subtests -- every test case needs a
namefield passed tot.Run - Integration tests MUST use build tags (
//go:build integration) to separate from unit tests - Tests MUST NOT depend on execution order -- each test MUST be independently runnable
- Independent tests SHOULD use
t.Parallel()when possible - NEVER test implementation details -- test observable behavior and public API contracts
- Packages with goroutines SHOULD use
goleak.VerifyTestMaininTestMainto detect goroutine leaks - Use testify as helpers, not a replacement for standard library
- Mock interfaces, not concrete types
- Keep unit tests fast (< 1ms), use build tags for integration tests
- Run tests with race detection in CI
- Include examples as executable documentation
Test Structure and Organization
File Conventions
// package_test.go - tests in same package (white-box, access unexported)
package mypackage
// mypackage_test.go - tests in test package (black-box, public API only)
package mypackage_test
Naming Conventions
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) { ... } // function test
func TestMyStruct_MyMethod(t *testing.T) { ... } // method test
func BenchmarkAdd(b *testing.B) { ... } // benchmark
func ExampleAdd() { ... } // example
Table-Driven Tests
Table-driven tests are the idiomatic Go way to test multiple scenarios. Always name each test case.
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
quantity int
unitPrice float64
expected float64
}{
{
name: "single item",
quantity: 1,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 10.0,
},
{
name: "bulk discount - 100 items",
quantity: 100,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 900.0, // 10% discount
},
{
name: "zero quantity",
quantity: 0,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 0.0,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)
if got != tt.expected {
t.Errorf("CalculatePrice(%d, %.2f) = %.2f, want %.2f",
tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice, got, tt.expected)
}
})
}
}
Unit Tests
Unit tests should be fast (< 1ms), isolated (no external dependencies), and deterministic.
Testing HTTP Handlers
Use httptest for handler tests with table-driven patterns. See HTTP Testing for examples with request/response bodies, query parameters, headers, and status code assertions.
Goroutine Leak Detection with goleak
Use go.uber.org/goleak to detect leaking goroutines, especially for concurrent code:
import (
"testing"
"go.uber.org/goleak"
)
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
goleak.VerifyTestMain(m)
}
To exclude specific goroutine stacks (for known leaks or library goroutines):
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
goleak.VerifyTestMain(m,
goleak.IgnoreCurrent(),
)
}
Or per-test:
func TestWorkerPool(t *testing.T) {
defer goleak.VerifyNone(t)
// ... test code ...
}
testing/synctest for Deterministic Goroutine Testing
Experimental:
testing/synctestis not yet covered by Go's compatibility guarantee. Its API may change in future releases. For stable alternatives, useclockwork(see Mocking).
testing/synctest (Go 1.24+) provides deterministic time for concurrent code testing. Time advances only when all goroutines are blocked, making ordering predictable.
When to use synctest instead of real time:
- Testing concurrent code with time-based operations (time.Sleep, time.After, time.Ticker)
- When race conditions need to be reproducible
- When tests are flaky due to timing issues
import (
"testing"
"time"
"testing/synctest"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func TestChannelTimeout(t *testing.T) {
synctest.Run(func(t *testing.T) {
is := assert.New(t)
ch := make(chan int, 1)
go func() {
time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
ch <- 42
}()
select {
case v := <-ch:
is.Equal(42, v)
case <-time.After(100 * time.Millisecond):
t.Fatal("timeout occurred")
}
})
}
Key differences in synctest:
time.Sleepadvances synthetic time instantly when the goroutine blockstime.Afterfires when synthetic time reaches the duration- All goroutines run to blocking points before time advances
- Test execution is deterministic and repeatable
Test Timeouts
For tests that may hang, use a timeout helper that panics with caller location. See Helpers.
Benchmarks
→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for advanced benchmarking: b.Loop() (Go 1.24+), benchstat, profiling from benchmarks, and CI regression detection.
Write benchmarks to measure performance and detect regressions:
func BenchmarkStringConcatenation(b *testing.B) {
b.Run("plus-operator", func(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
result := "a" + "b" + "c"
_ = result
}
})
b.Run("strings.Builder", func(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
var builder strings.Builder
builder.WriteString("a")
builder.WriteString("b")
builder.WriteString("c")
_ = builder.String()
}
})
}
Benchmarks with different input sizes:
func BenchmarkFibonacci(b *testing.B) {
sizes := []int{10, 20, 30}
for _, size := range sizes {
b.Run(fmt.Sprintf("n=%d", size), func(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs()
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
Fibonacci(size)
}
})
}
}
Parallel Tests
Use t.Parallel() to run tests concurrently:
func TestParallelOperations(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
data []byte
}{
{"small data", make([]byte, 1024)},
{"medium data", make([]byte, 1024*1024)},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
is := assert.New(t)
result := Process(tt.data)
is.NotNil(result)
})
}
}
Fuzzing
Use fuzzing to find edge cases and bugs:
func FuzzReverse(f *testing.F) {
f.Add("hello")
f.Add("")
f.Add("a")
f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, input string) {
reversed := Reverse(input)
doubleReversed := Reverse(reversed)
if input != doubleReversed {
t.Errorf("Reverse(Reverse(%q)) = %q, want %q", input, doubleReversed, input)
}
})
}
Examples as Documentation
Examples are executable documentation verified by go test:
func ExampleCalculatePrice() {
price := CalculatePrice(100, 10.0)
fmt.Printf("Price: %.2f\n", price)
// Output: Price: 900.00
}
func ExampleCalculatePrice_singleItem() {
price := CalculatePrice(1, 25.50)
fmt.Printf("Price: %.2f\n", price)
// Output: Price: 25.50
}
Code Coverage
# Generate coverage file
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
# View coverage in HTML
go tool cover -html=coverage.out
# Coverage by function
go tool cover -func=coverage.out
# Total coverage percentage
go tool cover -func=coverage.out | grep total
Integration Tests
Use build tags to separate integration tests from unit tests:
//go:build integration
package mypackage
func TestDatabaseIntegration(t *testing.T) {
db, err := sql.Open("postgres", os.Getenv("DATABASE_URL"))
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer db.Close()
// Test real database operations
}
Run integration tests separately:
go test -tags=integration ./...
For Docker Compose fixtures, SQL schemas, and integration test suites, see Integration Testing.
Mocking
Mock interfaces, not concrete types. Define interfaces where consumed, then create mock implementations.
For mock patterns, test fixtures, and time mocking, see Mocking.
Enforce with Linters
Many test best practices are enforced automatically by linters: thelper, paralleltest, testifylint. See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-linter skill for configuration and usage.
Cross-References
- -> See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testifyskill for detailed testify API (assert, require, mock, suite) - -> See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-databaseskill (testing.md) for database integration test patterns - -> See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrencyskill for goroutine leak detection with goleak - -> See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integrationskill for CI test configuration and GitHub Actions workflows - -> See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-linterskill for testifylint and paralleltest configuration
Quick Reference
go test ./... # all tests
go test -run TestName ./... # specific test by exact name
go test -run TestName/subtest ./... # subtests within a test
go test -run 'Test(Add|Sub)' ./... # multiple tests (regexp OR)
go test -run 'Test[A-Z]' ./... # tests starting with capital letter
go test -run 'TestUser.*' ./... # tests matching prefix
go test -run '.*Validation.*' ./... # tests containing substring
go test -run TestName/. ./... # all subtests of TestName
go test -run '/(unit|integration)' ./... # filter by subtest name
go test -race ./... # race detection
go test -cover ./... # coverage summary
go test -bench=. -benchmem ./... # benchmarks
go test -fuzz=FuzzName ./... # fuzzing
go test -tags=integration ./... # integration tests
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★49 reviews- ★★★★★Daniel Flores· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: golang-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for golang-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Verma· Dec 4, 2024
golang-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ava Mehta· Nov 23, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: golang-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Chen Flores· Nov 19, 2024
We added golang-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 7, 2024
golang-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 26, 2024
I recommend golang-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Li Verma· Oct 14, 2024
We added golang-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Chen Farah· Oct 10, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: golang-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Mei Abebe· Sep 25, 2024
golang-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 49