asc-workflow▌
rudrankriyam/app-store-connect-cli-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Define, validate, and run repo-local multi-step automations with .asc/workflow.json and asc workflow commands.
- ›Author workflows in .asc/workflow.json with support for global/workflow-level env, before/after hooks, error handlers, and conditional steps using if directives
- ›Run workflows locally or in CI with asc workflow run <name> , preview execution with --dry-run , and validate structure with asc workflow validate
- ›Supports sub-workflows (including private helper workflows), run
asc workflow
Use this skill when you need lane-style automation inside the CLI using:
asc workflow runasc workflow validateasc workflow list
This feature is best for deterministic automation that lives in your repo, is reviewable in PRs, and can run the same way locally and in CI.
Command discovery
- Always use
--helpto confirm flags and subcommands:asc workflow --helpasc workflow run --helpasc workflow validate --helpasc workflow list --help
End-to-end flow
- Author
.asc/workflow.json - Validate structure and references:
asc workflow validate
- Discover available workflows:
asc workflow listasc workflow list --all(includes private helpers)
- Preview execution without side effects:
asc workflow run --dry-run beta
- Execute with runtime params:
asc workflow run beta BUILD_ID:123456789 GROUP_ID:abcdef
File location and format
- Default path:
.asc/workflow.json - Override path:
asc workflow run --file ./path/to/workflow.json <name> - JSONC comments are supported (
//and/* ... */)
Output and CI contract
stdout: structured JSON result (status,steps, durations)stderr: step command output, hook output, dry-run previewsasc workflow validatealways prints JSON and returns non-zero when invalid
This enables machine-safe checks:
asc workflow validate | jq -e '.valid == true'
asc workflow run beta BUILD_ID:123 GROUP_ID:xyz | jq -e '.status == "ok"'
Schema (what the feature supports)
Top-level keys:
env: global defaultsbefore_all: command run once before stepsafter_all: command run once after successful stepserror: command run when any failure occursworkflows: named workflow map
Workflow keys:
descriptionprivate(not directly runnable)envsteps
Step forms:
- String shorthand:
"echo hello"-> run step - Object with:
run: shell commandworkflow: call sub-workflowname: label for reportingif: conditional var namewith: env overrides for workflow-call steps only
Runtime params (KEY:VALUE / KEY=VALUE)
asc workflow run <name> [KEY:VALUE ...]supports both separators:VERSION:2.1.0VERSION=2.1.0
- If both separators exist, the first one wins.
- Repeated keys are last-write-wins.
- In step commands, reference params via shell expansion (
$VAR). - Avoid putting secrets in
.asc/workflow.json; pass them via CI secrets/env.
Run-tail flags
asc workflow run also accepts core flags after the workflow name:
--dry-run--pretty--file
Examples:
asc workflow run beta --dry-runasc workflow run beta --file .asc/workflow.json BUILD_ID:123
Execution semantics
before_allruns once before step executionafter_allruns only when steps succeederrorruns on failure (step failure, before/after hook failure)- Sub-workflows are executed inline as part of the call step
- Maximum sub-workflow nesting depth is 16
Env precedence
Main workflow run:
definition.env<workflow.env< CLI params
Sub-workflow call step ("workflow": "...", "with": {...}):
- sub-workflow
envdefaults - caller env (including CLI params) overrides
- step
withoverrides all
Sub-workflows and private workflows
- Use
"workflow": "<name>"to call helper workflows. - Use
"private": truefor helper-only workflows. - Private workflows:
- cannot be run directly
- can be called by other workflows
- are hidden from
asc workflow listunless--allis used
- Validation catches unknown workflow references and cyclic references.
Conditionals (if)
- Add
"if": "VAR_NAME"on a step. - Step runs only if
VAR_NAMEis truthy. - Truthy:
1,true,yes,y,on(case-insensitive). - Resolution order for
iflookup:- merged workflow env/params
os.Getenv(VAR_NAME)
Dry-run behavior
asc workflow run --dry-run <name>does not execute commands.- It prints previews to
stderr. - Dry-run shows raw commands (without env expansion), which helps avoid secret leakage in previews.
Shell behavior
- Run steps use
bash -o pipefail -cwhen bash is available. - Fallback is
sh -cwhen bash is unavailable. - Pipelines therefore fail correctly in most CI shells when bash exists.
Practical authoring rules
- Keep workflow files in version control.
- Use IDs in step commands where possible for deterministic automation.
- Use
--confirmfor destructiveascoperations inside steps. - Validate first, then dry-run, then real run.
- Keep hooks lightweight and side-effect aware.
{
"env": {
"APP_ID": "123456789",
"VERSION": "1.0.0"
},
"before_all": "asc auth status",
"after_all": "echo workflow_done",
"error": "echo workflow_failed",
"workflows": {
"beta": {
"description": "Distribute a build to a TestFlight group and notify",
"env": {
"GROUP_ID": ""
},
"steps": [
{
"name": "list_builds",
"run": "asc builds list --app $APP_ID --sort -uploadedDate --limit 5"
},
{
"name": "list_groups",
"run": "asc testflight groups list --app $APP_ID --limit 20"
},
{
"name": "add_build_to_group",
"if": "BUILD_ID",
"run": "asc builds add-groups --build-id $BUILD_ID --group $GROUP_ID"
},
{
"name": "notify",
"if": "SLACK_WEBHOOK",
"run": "echo sent_release_notice"
}
]
},
"release": {
"description": "Submit a version for App Store review",
"steps": [
{
"workflow": "sync-metadata",
"with": {
"METADATA_DIR": "./metadata"
}
},
{
"name": "submit",
"run": "asc submit create --app $APP_ID --version $VERSION --build $BUILD_ID --confirm"
}
]
},
"sync-metadata": {
"private": true,
"description": "Private helper workflow (callable only via workflow steps)",
"steps": [
{
"name": "migrate_validate",
"run": "echo METADATA_DIR_is_$METADATA_DIR"
}
]
}
}
}
Useful invocations
# Validate and fail CI on invalid file
asc workflow validate | jq -e '.valid == true'
# Show discoverable workflows
asc workflow list --pretty
# Include private helpers
asc workflow list --all --pretty
# Preview a real run
asc workflow run --dry-run beta BUILD_ID:123 GROUP_ID:grp_abc
# Run with params and assert success
asc workflow run beta BUILD_ID:123 GROUP_ID:grp_abc | jq -e '.status == "ok"'
How to use asc-workflow on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add asc-workflow
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches asc-workflow from GitHub repository rudrankriyam/app-store-connect-cli-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate asc-workflow. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /asc-workflow) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★32 reviews- ★★★★★Camila Ghosh· Dec 20, 2024
Registry listing for asc-workflow matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kaira Haddad· Dec 16, 2024
Keeps context tight: asc-workflow is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 4, 2024
asc-workflow is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: asc-workflow is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Olivia Park· Nov 15, 2024
asc-workflow reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Meera Thomas· Nov 11, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: asc-workflow is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Kwame Kapoor· Nov 7, 2024
asc-workflow is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Kiara Gill· Oct 26, 2024
Useful defaults in asc-workflow — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 14, 2024
asc-workflow has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Aarav Robinson· Oct 6, 2024
I recommend asc-workflow for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 32