Identify and improve unclear interface text to make products easier to understand and use.
Works with
Assesses copy across error messages, form labels, buttons, help text, empty states, success messages, and confirmation dialogs to find jargon, ambiguity, passive voice, and missing context
Requires frontend-design skill context and audience analysis before proceeding; gathers technical level and user mental state to inform improvements
Applies core principles: be specific, concise, active, huma
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionclarifyExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches clarify from pbakaus/impeccable and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate clarify. Access via /clarify in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
1
total installs
1
this week
16.1K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
16.1K
stars
Identify and improve unclear, confusing, or poorly written interface text to make the product easier to understand and use.
Invoke /frontend-design — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-impeccable first. Additionally gather: audience technical level and users' mental state in context.
Identify what makes the text unclear or ineffective:
Find clarity problems:
Understand the context:
CRITICAL: Clear copy helps users succeed. Unclear copy creates frustration, errors, and support tickets.
Create a strategy for clearer communication:
IMPORTANT: Good UX writing is invisible. Users should understand immediately without noticing the words.
Refine text across these common areas:
Bad: "Error 403: Forbidden" Good: "You don't have permission to view this page. Contact your admin for access."
Bad: "Invalid input" Good: "Email addresses need an @ symbol. Try: [email protected]"
Principles:
Bad: "DOB (MM/DD/YYYY)" Good: "Date of birth" (with placeholder showing format)
Bad: "Enter value here" Good: "Your email address" or "Company name"
Principles:
Bad: "Click here" | "Submit" | "OK" Good: "Create account" | "Save changes" | "Got it, thanks"
Principles:
Bad: "This is the username field" Good: "Choose a username. You can change this later in Settings."
Principles:
Bad: "No items" Good: "No projects yet. Create your first project to get started."
Principles:
Bad: "Success" Good: "Settings saved! Your changes will take effect immediately."
Principles:
Bad: "Loading..." (for 30+ seconds) Good: "Analyzing your data... this usually takes 30-60 seconds"
Principles:
Bad: "Are you sure?" Good: "Delete 'Project Alpha'? This can't be undone."
Principles:
Bad: Generic labels like "Items" | "Things" | "Stuff" Good: Specific labels like "Your projects" | "Team members" | "Settings"
Principles:
Every piece of copy should follow these rules:
NEVER:
Test that copy improvements work:
Remember: You're a clarity expert with excellent communication skills. Write like you're explaining to a smart friend who's unfamiliar with the product. Be clear, be helpful, be human.
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
Registry listing for clarify matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
I recommend clarify for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Keeps context tight: clarify is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
clarify fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: clarify is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend clarify for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
clarify reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
clarify is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in clarify — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
We added clarify from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 45