prd▌
github/awesome-copilot · updated Apr 8, 2026
Generate comprehensive Product Requirements Documents that translate business vision into technical specifications.
- ›Follows a strict three-phase workflow: discovery interview to fill knowledge gaps, analysis and scoping to identify dependencies, and technical drafting using a standardized PRD schema
- ›Requires concrete, measurable success criteria and acceptance criteria; explicitly avoids vague language like \"fast\" or \"intuitive\" in favor of quantifiable benchmarks
- ›Covers executiv
Product Requirements Document (PRD)
Overview
Design comprehensive, production-grade Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) that bridge the gap between business vision and technical execution. This skill works for modern software systems, ensuring that requirements are clearly defined.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Starting a new product or feature development cycle
- Translating a vague idea into a concrete technical specification
- Defining requirements for AI-powered features
- Stakeholders need a unified "source of truth" for project scope
- User asks to "write a PRD", "document requirements", or "plan a feature"
Operational Workflow
Phase 1: Discovery (The Interview)
Before writing a single line of the PRD, you MUST interrogate the user to fill knowledge gaps. Do not assume context.
Ask about:
- The Core Problem: Why are we building this now?
- Success Metrics: How do we know it worked?
- Constraints: Budget, tech stack, or deadline?
Phase 2: Analysis & Scoping
Synthesize the user's input. Identify dependencies and hidden complexities.
- Map out the User Flow.
- Define Non-Goals to protect the timeline.
Phase 3: Technical Drafting
Generate the document using the Strict PRD Schema below.
PRD Quality Standards
Requirements Quality
Use concrete, measurable criteria. Avoid "fast", "easy", or "intuitive".
# Vague (BAD)
- The search should be fast and return relevant results.
- The UI must look modern and be easy to use.
# Concrete (GOOD)
+ The search must return results within 200ms for a 10k record dataset.
+ The search algorithm must achieve >= 85% Precision@10 in benchmark evals.
+ The UI must follow the 'Vercel/Next.js' design system and achieve 100% Lighthouse Accessibility score.
Strict PRD Schema
You MUST follow this exact structure for the output:
1. Executive Summary
- Problem Statement: 1-2 sentences on the pain point.
- Proposed Solution: 1-2 sentences on the fix.
- Success Criteria: 3-5 measurable KPIs.
2. User Experience & Functionality
- User Personas: Who is this for?
- User Stories:
As a [user], I want to [action] so that [benefit]. - Acceptance Criteria: Bulleted list of "Done" definitions for each story.
- Non-Goals: What are we NOT building?
3. AI System Requirements (If Applicable)
- Tool Requirements: What tools and APIs are needed?
- Evaluation Strategy: How to measure output quality and accuracy.
4. Technical Specifications
- Architecture Overview: Data flow and component interaction.
- Integration Points: APIs, DBs, and Auth.
- Security & Privacy: Data handling and compliance.
5. Risks & Roadmap
- Phased Rollout: MVP -> v1.1 -> v2.0.
- Technical Risks: Latency, cost, or dependency failures.
Implementation Guidelines
DO (Always)
- Define Testing: For AI systems, specify how to test and validate output quality.
- Iterate: Present a draft and ask for feedback on specific sections.
DON'T (Avoid)
- Skip Discovery: Never write a PRD without asking at least 2 clarifying questions first.
- Hallucinate Constraints: If the user didn't specify a tech stack, ask or label it as
TBD.
Example: Intelligent Search System
1. Executive Summary
Problem: Users struggle to find specific documentation snippets in massive repositories. Solution: An intelligent search system that provides direct answers with source citations. Success:
- Reduce search time by 50%.
- Citation accuracy >= 95%.
2. User Stories
- Story: As a developer, I want to ask natural language questions so I don't have to guess keywords.
- AC:
- Supports multi-turn clarification.
- Returns code blocks with "Copy" button.
3. AI System Architecture
- Tools Required:
codesearch,grep,webfetch.
4. Evaluation
- Benchmark: Test with 50 common developer questions.
- Pass Rate: 90% must match expected citations.
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★40 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for prd matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Soo Sharma· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: prd is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Liam Verma· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: prd is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Liam Tandon· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend prd for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Olivia Johnson· Nov 27, 2024
prd is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Soo Shah· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in prd — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: prd is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Hana Iyer· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for prd matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 3, 2024
prd fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Oct 22, 2024
prd has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 40