iterate-pr▌
davila7/claude-code-templates · updated Apr 8, 2026
Continuously iterate on the current branch until all CI checks pass and review feedback is addressed.
Iterate on PR Until CI Passes
Continuously iterate on the current branch until all CI checks pass and review feedback is addressed.
Requires: GitHub CLI (gh) authenticated and available.
Process
Step 1: Identify the PR
gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,baseRefName
If no PR exists for the current branch, stop and inform the user.
Step 2: Check CI Status First
Always check CI/GitHub Actions status before looking at review feedback:
gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket,link,workflow
The bucket field categorizes state into: pass, fail, pending, skipping, or cancel.
Important: If any of these checks are still pending, wait before proceeding:
sentry/sentry-iocodecovcursor/bugbot/seer- Any linter or code analysis checks
These bots may post additional feedback comments once their checks complete. Waiting avoids duplicate work.
Step 3: Gather Review Feedback
Once CI checks have completed (or at least the bot-related checks), gather human and bot feedback:
Review Comments and Status:
gh pr view --json reviews,comments,reviewDecision
Inline Code Review Comments:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments
PR Conversation Comments (includes bot comments):
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments
Look for bot comments from: Sentry, Codecov, Cursor, Bugbot, Seer, and other automated tools.
Step 4: Investigate Failures
For each CI failure, get the actual logs:
# List recent runs for this branch
gh run list --branch $(git branch --show-current) --limit 5 --json databaseId,name,status,conclusion
# View failed logs for a specific run
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
Do NOT assume what failed based on the check name alone. Always read the actual logs.
Step 5: Validate Feedback
For each piece of feedback (CI failure or review comment):
- Read the relevant code - Understand the context before making changes
- Verify the issue is real - Not all feedback is correct; reviewers and bots can be wrong
- Check if already addressed - The issue may have been fixed in a subsequent commit
- Skip invalid feedback - If the concern is not legitimate, move on
Step 6: Address Valid Issues
Make minimal, targeted code changes. Only fix what is actually broken.
Step 7: Commit and Push
git add -A
git commit -m "fix: <descriptive message of what was fixed>"
git push
Step 8: Wait for CI
Use the built-in watch functionality:
gh pr checks --watch --interval 30
This waits until all checks complete. Exit code 0 means all passed, exit code 1 means failures.
Alternatively, poll manually if you need more control:
gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket | jq '.[] | select(.bucket != "pass")'
Step 9: Repeat
Return to Step 2 if:
- Any CI checks failed
- New review feedback appeared
Continue until all checks pass and no unaddressed feedback remains.
Exit Conditions
Success:
- All CI checks are green (
bucket: pass) - No unaddressed human review feedback
Ask for Help:
- Same failure persists after 3 attempts (likely a flaky test or deeper issue)
- Review feedback requires clarification or decision from the user
- CI failure is unrelated to branch changes (infrastructure issue)
Stop Immediately:
- No PR exists for the current branch
- Branch is out of sync and needs rebase (inform user)
Tips
- Use
gh pr checks --requiredto focus only on required checks - Use
gh run view <run-id> --verboseto see all job steps, not just failures - If a check is from an external service, the
linkfield in checks JSON provides the URL to investigate
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★60 reviews- ★★★★★Yuki Choi· Dec 20, 2024
We added iterate-pr from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for iterate-pr matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Aditi Jain· Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in iterate-pr — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Ndlovu· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: iterate-pr is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Mia Gill· Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: iterate-pr is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Isabella Diallo· Nov 27, 2024
I recommend iterate-pr for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Olivia Tandon· Nov 27, 2024
We added iterate-pr from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Mia Rao· Nov 23, 2024
iterate-pr has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Abebe· Nov 15, 2024
iterate-pr fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Aditi Iyer· Nov 11, 2024
Keeps context tight: iterate-pr is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 60