gh-fix-ci▌
openai/skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
Debug and fix failing GitHub Actions checks in pull requests using gh CLI inspection and log analysis.
- ›Inspects PR checks via GitHub CLI, fetches GitHub Actions logs, and summarizes failure context with actionable log snippets
- ›Requires prior gh authentication with repo and workflow scopes; verifies status before proceeding
- ›Drafts a fix plan (using create-plan skill if available, otherwise inline) and implements only after explicit user approval
- ›Treats external CI providers (Buildk
Gh Pr Checks Plan Fix
Overview
Use gh to locate failing PR checks, fetch GitHub Actions logs for actionable failures, summarize the failure snippet, then propose a fix plan and implement after explicit approval.
- If a plan-oriented skill (for example
create-plan) is available, use it; otherwise draft a concise plan inline and request approval before implementing.
Prereq: authenticate with the standard GitHub CLI once (for example, run gh auth login), then confirm with gh auth status (repo + workflow scopes are typically required).
Inputs
repo: path inside the repo (default.)pr: PR number or URL (optional; defaults to current branch PR)ghauthentication for the repo host
Quick start
python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "<number-or-url>"- Add
--jsonif you want machine-friendly output for summarization.
Workflow
- Verify gh authentication.
- Run
gh auth statusin the repo. - If unauthenticated, ask the user to run
gh auth login(ensuring repo + workflow scopes) before proceeding.
- Run
- Resolve the PR.
- Prefer the current branch PR:
gh pr view --json number,url. - If the user provides a PR number or URL, use that directly.
- Prefer the current branch PR:
- Inspect failing checks (GitHub Actions only).
- Preferred: run the bundled script (handles gh field drift and job-log fallbacks):
python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "<number-or-url>"- Add
--jsonfor machine-friendly output.
- Manual fallback:
gh pr checks <pr> --json name,state,bucket,link,startedAt,completedAt,workflow- If a field is rejected, rerun with the available fields reported by
gh.
- If a field is rejected, rerun with the available fields reported by
- For each failing check, extract the run id from
detailsUrland run:gh run view <run_id> --json name,workflowName,conclusion,status,url,event,headBranch,headShagh run view <run_id> --log
- If the run log says it is still in progress, fetch job logs directly:
gh api "/repos/<owner>/<repo>/actions/jobs/<job_id>/logs" > "<path>"
- Preferred: run the bundled script (handles gh field drift and job-log fallbacks):
- Scope non-GitHub Actions checks.
- If
detailsUrlis not a GitHub Actions run, label it as external and only report the URL. - Do not attempt Buildkite or other providers; keep the workflow lean.
- If
- Summarize failures for the user.
- Provide the failing check name, run URL (if any), and a concise log snippet.
- Call out missing logs explicitly.
- Create a plan.
- Use the
create-planskill to draft a concise plan and request approval.
- Use the
- Implement after approval.
- Apply the approved plan, summarize diffs/tests, and ask about opening a PR.
- Recheck status.
- After changes, suggest re-running the relevant tests and
gh pr checksto confirm.
- After changes, suggest re-running the relevant tests and
Bundled Resources
scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py
Fetch failing PR checks, pull GitHub Actions logs, and extract a failure snippet. Exits non-zero when failures remain so it can be used in automation.
Usage examples:
python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "123"python "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --pr "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123" --jsonpython "<path-to-skill>/scripts/inspect_pr_checks.py" --repo "." --max-lines 200 --context 40
Ratings
4.5★★★★★10 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 10, 2024
gh-fix-ci is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Sep 9, 2024
Keeps context tight: gh-fix-ci is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Aug 8, 2024
Registry listing for gh-fix-ci matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Jul 7, 2024
gh-fix-ci reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Jun 6, 2024
I recommend gh-fix-ci for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· May 5, 2024
Useful defaults in gh-fix-ci — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Apr 4, 2024
gh-fix-ci has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Mar 3, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: gh-fix-ci is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Feb 2, 2024
We added gh-fix-ci from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Jan 1, 2024
gh-fix-ci fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.