linear▌
lobehub/lobehub · updated Apr 8, 2026
Linear issue management with workflows for retrieving, updating, and commenting on LOBE-xxx issues.
- ›Retrieve issue details, check for sub-issues, and update status using dedicated MCP tools before and after work
- ›Automatically link PRs to Linear issues using magic keywords (Fixes/Closes/Resolves LOBE-xxx) in PR body
- ›Add completion comments to all referenced issues immediately after PR creation with a standardized format summarizing changes, files modified, and PR reference
- ›Create n
Linear Issue Management
Before using Linear workflows, search for linear MCP tools. If not found, treat as not installed.
⚠️ CRITICAL: PR Creation with Linear Issues
When creating a PR that references Linear issues (LOBE-xxx), you MUST:
- Create the PR with magic keywords (
Fixes LOBE-xxx) - IMMEDIATELY after PR creation, add completion comments to ALL referenced Linear issues
- Do NOT consider the task complete until Linear comments are added
This is NON-NEGOTIABLE. Skipping Linear comments is a workflow violation.
Workflow
- Retrieve issue details before starting:
mcp__linear-server__get_issue - Check for sub-issues: Use
mcp__linear-server__list_issueswithparentIdfilter - Update issue status when completing:
mcp__linear-server__update_issue - Add completion comment (REQUIRED):
mcp__linear-server__create_comment
Creating Issues
When creating issues with mcp__linear-server__create_issue, MUST add the claude code label.
Completion Comment Format
Every completed issue MUST have a comment summarizing work done:
## Changes Summary
- **Feature**: Brief description of what was implemented
- **Files Changed**: List key files modified
- **PR**: #xxx or PR URL
### Key Changes
- Change 1
- Change 2
- ...
This is critical for:
- Team visibility
- Code review context
- Future reference
PR Association (REQUIRED)
When creating PRs for Linear issues, include magic keywords in PR body:
Fixes LOBE-123Closes LOBE-123Resolves LOBE-123
Per-Issue Completion Rule
When working on multiple issues, update EACH issue IMMEDIATELY after completing it:
- Complete implementation
- Run
bun run type-check - Run related tests
- Create PR if needed
- Update status to "In Review" (NOT "Done")
- Add completion comment immediately
- Move to next issue
Note: Status → "In Review" when PR created. "Done" only after PR merged.
❌ Wrong: Complete all → Create PR → Forget Linear comments
✅ Correct: Complete → Create PR → Add Linear comments → Task done
Ratings
4.5★★★★★10 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 10, 2024
linear is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Sep 9, 2024
Keeps context tight: linear is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Aug 8, 2024
Registry listing for linear matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Jul 7, 2024
linear reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Jun 6, 2024
I recommend linear for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· May 5, 2024
Useful defaults in linear — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Apr 4, 2024
linear has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Mar 3, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: linear is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Feb 2, 2024
We added linear from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Jan 1, 2024
linear fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.