Productivity

ghost-scan-code

ghostsecurity/skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/ghostsecurity/skills --skill ghost-scan-code
summary

Static analysis security scanner that identifies OWASP vulnerabilities across backend, frontend, mobile, and library code.

  • Scans for SQL injection, XSS, BOLA, BFLA, SSRF, prototype pollution, unsafe deserialization, ReDoS, path traversal, and zip slip vulnerabilities
  • Three scan depths available: quick (default), balanced, and full, with token usage warnings for comprehensive scans
  • Automated workflow: plans vulnerability vectors per project type, nominates candidate files, analyzes fi
skill.md

Find Issues

You find security issues in a repository. This skill plans which vulnerability vectors to scan, then executes those scans against each project.

Inputs

  • depth: quick (default), balanced, or full — override via $ARGUMENTS

$ARGUMENTS

Note: Arguments passed can be used to customize the scan workflow if provided. For example, if the user specifies a specific set of vectors, count of vectors, specific candidate files, areas to focus on, count of candidate files, etc., ensure the relevant details are passed to the relevant steps in the skill.

Supporting files


Step 1: Setup

Compute the repo-specific output directory:

repo_name=$(basename "$(pwd)") && remote_url=$(git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null || pwd) && short_hash=$(printf '%s' "$remote_url" | git hash-object --stdin | cut -c1-8) && repo_id="${repo_name}-${short_hash}" && short_sha=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || date +%Y%m%d) && ghost_repo_dir="$HOME/.ghost/repos/${repo_id}" && scan_dir="${ghost_repo_dir}/scans/${short_sha}/code" && cache_dir="${ghost_repo_dir}/cache" && mkdir -p "$scan_dir" && echo "scan_dir=$scan_dir cache_dir=$cache_dir"
  1. Read $cache_dir/repo.md — if missing, run the repo-context skill first and then continue.
  2. Read criteria/index.yaml to get the valid agent→vector mappings per project type
  3. Set depth to quick if not provided
  4. If depth is full, warn the user that a full scan uses significantly more tokens and ask them to confirm before proceeding. If they decline, fall back to balanced.

Step 2: Plan Scans

If $scan_dir/plan.md already exists, skip to the next step.

Otherwise, run the planner using scripts/loop.sh:

bash <path-to-loop.sh> $scan_dir planner.md "- depth: <depth>
- arguments: <relevant argument overrides if any, otherwise omit>" 1 $cache_dir

Use a 10-minute timeout. If the command times out, re-run it — the script resumes from where it left off. If it fails 3 times consecutively with the same error, stop and report the failure.

Verify: $scan_dir/plan.md exists and contains at least one ## Project: section before proceeding.


Step 3: Nominate Files

If $scan_dir/nominations.md does not exist, generate it by reading $scan_dir/plan.md and for each project section (## Project: <base_path> (<type>)), parse the Recommended Scans table. For each row, extract the Agent and Vector columns. Write $scan_dir/nominations.md - one line per (project, agent, vector) combination. Skip projects with empty scan tables.

# Nominations

- [ ] <base_path> (<type>) | <agent> | <vector>
- [ ] <base_path> (<type>) | <agent> | <vector>
...

If $scan_dir/nominations.md already exists, change every top level task - [x] to - [ ]. Keep all indented lines/subtasks beneath each item unchanged.

Run nomination script

Using scripts/loop.sh:

bash <path-to-loop.sh> $scan_dir nominator.md "- depth: <depth>
- arguments: <relevant argument overrides if any, otherwise omit>" 5 $cache_dir

Use a 10-minute timeout. If the command times out, re-run it — the script resumes from where it left off. If it fails 3 times consecutively with the same error, stop and report the failure.

Verify: $scan_dir/nominations.md contains at least one - [x] line before proceeding.


Step 4: Analyze Nominated Files

Read $scan_dir/nominations.md. For each candidate file under a checked - [x] line, append to $scan_dir/analyses.md (skip candidates already listed in analyses.md).

- [ ] <base_path> (<type>) | <agent> | <vector> | <candidate_file>

Create the findings directory:

mkdir -p $scan_dir/findings

Run analysis script

Using scripts/loop.sh:

bash <path-to-loop.sh> $scan_dir analyzer.md "" 5 $cache_dir

Use a 10-minute timeout. If the command times out, re-run it — the script resumes from where it left off. If it fails 3 times consecutively with the same error, stop and report the failure.

Verify: $scan_dir/analyses.md contains at least one - [x] line before proceeding.


Step 5: Verify Findings

List all .md files in $scan_dir/findings/. If none exist, write a no-findings.md summary and stop.

Using scripts/loop.sh:

bash <path-to-loop.sh> $scan_dir verifier.md "" 5 $cache_dir

Use a 10-minute timeout. If the command times out, re-run it — the script resumes from where it left off. If it fails 3 times consecutively with the same error, stop and report the failure.


Completion

After all steps complete, report the scan results:

  1. List all finding files in $scan_dir/findings/
  2. Count verified vs rejected findings
  3. Present a summary to the user
general reviews

Ratings

4.529 reviews
  • Amina Park· Dec 24, 2024

    ghost-scan-code has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Jin Yang· Nov 15, 2024

    ghost-scan-code fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Min Farah· Oct 2, 2024

    We added ghost-scan-code from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Sakshi Patil· Sep 17, 2024

    ghost-scan-code has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Mia Robinson· Sep 1, 2024

    ghost-scan-code has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Mia Taylor· Aug 20, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ghost-scan-code is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Aug 8, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ghost-scan-code is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Piyush G· Jul 27, 2024

    We added ghost-scan-code from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Naina Mensah· Jul 11, 2024

    We added ghost-scan-code from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Anaya Anderson· Jul 3, 2024

    ghost-scan-code reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 29

1 / 3